By By Elizabeth Ugbo
The Department of State Services has arraigned Nasir El-Rufai before the Federal High Court in Abuja for alleged unlawful interception of communications. The case, heard by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, began after the DSS filed charges in February 2026. The prosecution accused El-Rufai of wiretapping the phone lines of Nuhu Ribadu. The defendant pleaded not guilty to the five-count charge.
Defence Opposes Witness Anonymity Request
The defence strongly opposed the prosecution’s request to conceal witnesses’ identities. Counsel argued that every accused person has the right to know their accusers.
They also stated that no evidence showed El-Rufai posed a threat to anyone. Furthermore, they warned that granting anonymity could prejudice the court against the defendant.
In response, the DSS insisted that revealing identities could endanger witnesses and their families. Therefore, it requested pseudonyms for court proceedings.
Dispute Over Trial Preparation and Evidence
The defence applied for an order compelling the prosecution to provide proof of evidence. According to counsel, this step would ensure proper trial preparation.
However, the prosecution opposed the request. It argued that the materials sought were not tied to the filed processes.
Additionally, the defence filed an application to quash the charges. The prosecution countered that such an application cannot proceed after a plea.
Court Accepts Amended Charges
At the start of proceedings, DSS counsel sought to replace the earlier three-count charge with a new five-count charge filed on April 13.
The defence raised no objection. Consequently, the court struck out the earlier charge and adopted the amended one.
After the charges were read, El-Rufai pleaded not guilty. The prosecution then requested three consecutive trial dates.
Bail Application and Custody Concerns
The defence opposed the proposed trial schedule. Counsel explained that El-Rufai remains in custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.
They argued that limited access could affect trial preparation.
Meanwhile, the defence reminded the court of a pending bail application filed on February 17. Initially, a supporting affidavit was missing. The judge paused proceedings to resolve the issue.
When the document surfaced, the DSS confirmed it would not oppose bail.
Charges Linked to Cybercrime and Communications Laws
The charges stem from suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/99/2026. The DSS accused El-Rufai of violating the Cybercrimes (Prohibition) Act, 2024 and the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.
Prosecutors allege he unlawfully intercepted sensitive communications linked to national security.
